Close Menu
Crypto Chain Post
    Trending

    Upexi to Tokenize Shares, Holds 735,692 SOL

    June 27, 2025

    Gradient Network’s $10 Million Fund Signals Decentralized AI Shift

    June 27, 2025

    Coinbase Stock Soars, Taps New Closing High

    June 27, 2025

    Binance Founder Declares 0.1 Bitcoin the Future American Dream

    June 27, 2025

    0.1 BTC Is Future American Dream, Says Binance’s CZ

    June 27, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram TikTok Telegram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    Friday, June 27
    Crypto Chain Post
    Price Index Newsletter
    • Home
    • News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoin
    • Blockchain
    • Markets
    • NFTs
    • DeFi
    • Web3
    • Analysis
    • Metaverse
    • Resources
      • Price Index
      • Crypto Heatmap
      • Glossary
      • Exchange
      • Economic Calendar
    • More
      • GameFi
      • ICO
      • Legal
      • Security
    Crypto Chain Post
    Home » Rejects Lido’s Claim as a Non-Entity, Finding DAO Participants Liable Despite Its Decentralized Structure
    Legal

    Rejects Lido’s Claim as a Non-Entity, Finding DAO Participants Liable Despite Its Decentralized Structure

    News RoomBy News RoomNovember 19, 2024No Comments1 Min Read

    A federal court judge ruled Monday that Lido DAO, the governing body behind the popular liquid staking protocol, can be treated as a general partnership under state law. The court rejected Lido’s claim that it is not a legal entity, classifying it as a general partnership and setting a precedent for how profit-oriented DAOs should be treated.

    It also ruled that identifiable participants managed the DAO’s operations and therefore could not evade liability through its decentralized structure, according to court documents filed in the U.S. Northern District Court in California. Paradigm Operations, Andreessen Horowitz, and Dragonfly Digital Management were held liable as general partners based on their alleged active participation in Lido’s management and operations.

    According to court documents, plaintiff Andrew Samuels purchased LDO tokens on the secondary market in April and May 2023 through the Gemini exchange. By December of that year, Samuels had filed a class action lawsuit after he suffered losses from purchasing the platform’s native LDO tokens, claiming they were sold to him as unregistered securities and holding Lido DAO responsible for the decline in their value.

    Image: freepik

    Read the full article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related News

    Judge Torres Rejects Ripple-SEC Motion, Says Court Won’t Reverse Final XRP Ruling

    June 27, 2025

    Lost in Translation – A Look at Who Is Really Building a Korean Stablecoin

    June 27, 2025

    House clears HB 1664, setting Commerce Department as lead federal blockchain coordinator

    June 26, 2025

    Crypto businesses in Poland brace for impact as new bill looms

    June 26, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top News

    Gradient Network’s $10 Million Fund Signals Decentralized AI Shift

    June 27, 2025

    Coinbase Stock Soars, Taps New Closing High

    June 27, 2025

    Binance Founder Declares 0.1 Bitcoin the Future American Dream

    June 27, 2025
    Advertisement
    Demo
    Crypto Chain Post
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Crypto Chain Post. All Rights Reserved.

    71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London United Kingdom, WC2H 9JQ

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.