Close Menu
Crypto Chain Post
    Trending

    UK Startup Optalysys Debuts Server for Blockchains

    June 16, 2025

    What Do Current Funding Rates in Bitcoin and Altcoins Tell Us? Here Are the Latest Data

    June 16, 2025

    Bitcoin Exchange Binance Continues to Focus on USDC Pairs! Lists Three New Altcoin Trading Pairs! Here Are the Details

    June 16, 2025

    HBAR Price Prediction: Massive Move Coming Soon?

    June 16, 2025

    Hong Kong accelerates stablecoin licensing to tap into global market boom

    June 16, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram TikTok Telegram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    Monday, June 16
    Crypto Chain Post
    Price Index Newsletter
    • Home
    • News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoin
    • Blockchain
    • Markets
    • NFTs
    • DeFi
    • Web3
    • Analysis
    • Metaverse
    • Resources
      • Price Index
      • Crypto Heatmap
      • Glossary
      • Exchange
      • Economic Calendar
    • More
      • GameFi
      • ICO
      • Legal
      • Security
    Crypto Chain Post
    Home » Pumpfun hit with federal lawsuit over alleged $500M pump-and-dump scheme
    Legal

    Pumpfun hit with federal lawsuit over alleged $500M pump-and-dump scheme

    News RoomBy News RoomFebruary 1, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read

    Pump.fun, a Solana-based token launch platform, is facing a federal class action lawsuit alleging it orchestrated an extensive scheme to issue and promote unregistered securities, violating US securities laws, according to a Jan. 30 court filing.

    Diego Aguilar, a Pump.fun user, filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Baton Corporation Limited — the entity behind Pump.fun — and its founders, Alon Cohen, Dylan Kerler, and Noah Bernhard Hugo Tweedale.

    Aguilar, represented by Burwick Law, claims the platform facilitated a systematic pump-and-dump scheme, extracting nearly $500 million in fees by promoting and selling unregistered securities.

    Pump.fun has yet to issue a public response to the lawsuit.

    Fraud allegations

    The lawsuit alleges Pump.fun functioned as a hub for unregistered securities sales, partnering with influencers to drive speculative interest in its tokens.

    Aguilar, who suffered losses from investing in FRED, FWOG, and GRIFFAIN, claims the platform employed aggressive marketing tactics to create the illusion of legitimacy while operating what the lawsuit describes as an “evolution of Ponzi and pump-and-dump schemes.”

    According to court documents, Pump.fun used a standardized token infrastructure across all memecoins launched on its platform, including a proprietary bonding curve mechanism that determined token pricing based on demand.

    The filing argues this structure ensured that all tokens had identical speculative characteristics, making them unregistered securities under federal law.

    The lawsuit also states that Pump.fun omitted basic investor protections such as Know Your Customer verification and anti-money laundering protocols, allowing minors to invest in speculative assets without oversight. Additionally, it alleges the platform was used to launch tokens promoting antisemitism, racism, and explicit content.

    Seeking jury trial

    The lawsuit details how Pump.fun allegedly promoted FRED, FWOG, and GRIFFAIN as investment opportunities through coordinated influencer campaigns and exchange listings.

    It claims the platform marketed FRED with high-quality artwork and aggressive promotion, securing multiple exchange listings and a significant social media presence.

    Meanwhile, FWOG was presented as a competitor to other successful memecoins, using social media hype to drive trading volume, while GRIFFAIN was positioned as part of an AI-powered trading system — allegedly promoted with misleading claims of automated profit generation.

    Each token’s value was heavily dependent on Pump.fun’s marketing, exchange listings, and community engagement, factors the lawsuit argues establish them as securities under the Howey Test.

    This lawsuit marks the third legal action against Pump.fun in recent months. The company has previously been sued over its role in launching the PNUT and HAWK tokens.

    The case raises broader questions about the legality of token launchpads and their liability in facilitating speculative investments. Aguilar and his attorneys are seeking a jury trial to pursue damages and further regulatory scrutiny of Pump.fun’s business model.

    Read the full article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related News

    Hong Kong accelerates stablecoin licensing to tap into global market boom

    June 16, 2025

    Vietnam Passes Landmark Law Defining Digital Assets, Boosting AI and Chip Sectors

    June 16, 2025

    Will XRP Skyrocket to $5 After Ripple Lawsuit Decision Today? Legal Expert Says ‘Don’t Hope..’

    June 16, 2025

    Lawyer Reveals The Strongest Argument In The Joint Motion As Decision Day Looms

    June 16, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top News

    What Do Current Funding Rates in Bitcoin and Altcoins Tell Us? Here Are the Latest Data

    June 16, 2025

    Bitcoin Exchange Binance Continues to Focus on USDC Pairs! Lists Three New Altcoin Trading Pairs! Here Are the Details

    June 16, 2025

    HBAR Price Prediction: Massive Move Coming Soon?

    June 16, 2025
    Advertisement
    Demo
    Crypto Chain Post
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Crypto Chain Post. All Rights Reserved.

    71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London United Kingdom, WC2H 9JQ

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.