Close Menu
Crypto Chain Post
    Trending

    US Bombs Iran, and Now Everyone’s Wagering on What’s Next

    June 22, 2025

    Cardano ETF Approval Odds in 2025 Hit All Time High on Polymarket

    June 22, 2025

    Ethereum Whale Capitulates? $12M ETH Dump Signals Fear

    June 22, 2025

    Who’s Leading the Memecoin Charge?

    June 22, 2025

    Ethereum Futures Signal Heavy Sell-Off Amid US-Iran Escalation

    June 22, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram TikTok Telegram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    Sunday, June 22
    Crypto Chain Post
    Price Index Newsletter
    • Home
    • News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoin
    • Blockchain
    • Markets
    • NFTs
    • DeFi
    • Web3
    • Analysis
    • Metaverse
    • Resources
      • Price Index
      • Crypto Heatmap
      • Glossary
      • Exchange
      • Economic Calendar
    • More
      • GameFi
      • ICO
      • Legal
      • Security
    Crypto Chain Post
    Home » US urges court to uphold Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) conviction
    Legal

    US urges court to uphold Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) conviction

    News RoomBy News RoomDecember 19, 2024No Comments4 Mins Read

    The US government has finally responded to Sam Bankman-Fried’s (SBF) appeal, stating that the initial conviction and forfeiture order against the former CEO of the bankrupt exchange should be affirmed. In its response, the government countered all the arguments raised in the SBF appeal.

    The US team, led by the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Damian Williams, filed the response on December 13. They noted that the District Court made the right decisions throughout the trial and was not biased against SBF, as the former CEO had claimed.

    To prove this point, they argued that the court was right to instruct the jury to consider fraudulent intent, as there was overwhelming evidence of this in the trial.

    According to the government counsel, Bankman-Fried intended to cause loss to the victims, and none of the trial court instructions wrongly influenced the jury to convict him of this intention to cause loss.

    They wrote:

    “(The) loss to the victim was not “an incidental byproduct of the scheme,” Kelly, 590 US at 402—obtaining the victims’ property was the core object of Bankman-Fried’s deception.”

    Based on this, the government argued that the court’s instruction to the jury to ignore the SBF “No Ultimate Harm” defense in the trial was correct.

    During the trial, SBF said that the instruction was unnecessary but later argued on appeal that it was a wrong statement of law. However, the US counsel claims that standard instructions in fraud trials and temporary deprivation of another’s property for personal profit is enough to constitute a scheme to defraud.

    Government says the exclusion of evidence by the trial judge was correct

    Meanwhile, a chunk of SBF’s arguments in the appeal relied on what he believed was the wrongful exclusion of evidence that could have helped his case by the trial judge. Unsurprisingly, the government focused on disproving these arguments, noting that the judge was right.

    During the trial, the judge ruled that the evidence that SBF could present should be limited to show that he was acting in good faith. In his attempt to prove this, SBF wanted to present evidence showing that his investments with FTX funds were strategic, and he repaid the debt to customers and creditors. He also tried to prove that his decisions were based on legal counsel.

    However, the trial judge limited the evidence he could provide and sometimes made him give evidence without the jury, noting that it was not specific, and some could even mislead the jury. SBF argued in his appeal that these limitations ruined his case.

    In its response, the government stated that its own evidence about losses suffered due to SBF actions is relevant, and even if the former CEO had presented evidence showing he could repay, it would still not absolve him of the crime. It added that the court was right to order the criminal forfeiture of $11 billion against SBF as these funds were fraudulently obtained, and the size of the forfeiture is commensurate to the gravity of the action.

    What next for SBF?

    With the US government now filing its response to the appeal, it is up to SBF to reply to the counterarguments raised, and he has until January 31 to do that. However, whether the convicted CEO, who is currently serving his 25-year sentence, will win the appeal remains questionable.

    The core of his appeal has been that he did not get a fair trial and was presumed guilty by the prosecutors and judges involved in his case. However, many legal experts believe that it is unlikely for the Appellate court to grant a retrial especially if the appellant cannot sufficiently prove that the trial court acted inappropriately.

    While SBF has alleged some bias, noting the several criticisms of his counsel by the trial judge, the government lawyers noted that the judge also criticized the prosecution during the trial.

    Meanwhile, FTX is already planning to repay the customers with 98% of the customers likely to get their refunds within the next three months. However, they will be receiving their funds at November 2022 valuations even though prices have more than tripled since then.

    A Step-By-Step System To Launching Your Web3 Career and Landing High-Paying Crypto Jobs in 90 Days.

    Read the full article here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related News

    Nigeria SEC warns against unregistered crypto platform

    June 21, 2025

    Texas governor signs bill to protect state Bitcoin reserve as a permanent fund if established

    June 20, 2025

    USDC, USDT Market Caps Could Grow 30% Annually Under New U.S. Law: Bitget CEO

    June 20, 2025

    Tax chief urges crypto trading infrastructure in Russia

    June 20, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top News

    Cardano ETF Approval Odds in 2025 Hit All Time High on Polymarket

    June 22, 2025

    Ethereum Whale Capitulates? $12M ETH Dump Signals Fear

    June 22, 2025

    Who’s Leading the Memecoin Charge?

    June 22, 2025
    Advertisement
    Demo
    Crypto Chain Post
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    © 2025 Crypto Chain Post. All Rights Reserved.

    71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London United Kingdom, WC2H 9JQ

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.