Thursday, January 16

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed its opening brief in the XRP lawsuit on Wednesday, sparking discussions across the crypto community. Meanwhile, XRP soared to a seven-year high of $3.10, gaining significant attention.

Jeremy Hogan, a partner at Hogan & Hogan, criticized the SEC’s brief, calling it “lackluster” and suggesting that even the brief’s author seemed aware of the weak arguments. Hogan highlighted that the SEC’s appeal focuses solely on Judge Analisa Torres’ ruling that XRP, when sold to retail investors, is not a security.

This SEC brief was hard to work thru because, IMO, the case won’t be ruled on. But I’ve come this far so, dangit, here we go! My thoughts on the initial Ripple v. SEC appeal brief…

We aren’t holding back tonight. 🙂 https://t.co/l8Tcqdfuxc pic.twitter.com/bIWnJC1y3N

— Jeremy Hogan (@attorneyjeremy1) January 16, 2025

Related:Ripple-SEC Appeals Heat Up as Deadline Looms for Opening Brief

SEC’s Argument Lacks Supporting Evidence

Hogan noted that nearly half of the SEC’s brief merely reiterates the trial court’s ruling, adding little substance to its appeal. The SEC argues that it does not need to prove that XRP retail investors were aware of Ripple’s statements regarding price growth. However, Hogan countered that this claim conflicts with established legal standards. In an X (formerly Twitter) post, Hogan explained:

“Further, not needing to show “reliance” (which is what it argues) is a completely different thing than not needing to even show “knowledge.””

Ripple’s Defense Supported by Community Evidence

Hogan expressed surprise at the SEC’s failure to provide any credible evidence that retail buyers knew of Ripple’s alleged “promises” to boost XRP’s value. John Deaton, an attorney who represented XRP holders during the case, submitted thousands of affidavits proving that no such promises were made. The SEC has yet to adequately address this argument.

Hogan predicted that the court is likely to uphold Torres’ ruling, forcing the SEC to demonstrate “knowledge of promotional statements.” This process would be both expensive and time-consuming, potentially weakening the agency’s overall case.

Political Pressure on the SEC Leadership

Hogan suggested that political factors may influence the SEC’s stance. He noted that Gary Gensler, the agency’s chair, and the two Democratic SEC commissioners backing the brief are likely preparing for changes as Donald Trump’s administration, viewed as crypto-friendly, begins in four days.

Hogan added that the SEC’s approach may be part of an effort to delay proceedings, although this strategy could result in unfavorable rulings that set a broader precedent.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.



Read the full article here

Share.
Leave A Reply

Exit mobile version